Tag Archives: crisis management

Digital marketing frameworks–things to consider

There are steps that the digital marketer should include in the digital marketing playbook. These steps could be incorporated into a workable framework which can then expand into a set of workable plans. The framework should involve the following  four steps after the strategy and goal setting exercise has been completed:


You need to fully understand their audience. You should know its media habits such as which device they prefer to use – and when they use it. The online landscape changes rapidly so resources should be adjusted to suit. A listening audit should be carried our to make sure that the chosen channels in the marketing plan are the same channels the audience uses. A benchmark can then be set for each platform for the campaign with associated KPIs.


The build phase of a campaign could be as simple as creating a content calendar, developing training for the team, or designing a creative brief for the agency. Whatever the build phase contains it is important that it ties in with the digital strategy and overall business strategy.

Whilst a content calendar is easy to create, it often forms the core of all marketing activity. It might contain details on how many social media posts to create, or when to write a particular blog post.  You should manage the differing types of content that goes on what channel, and when it should be posted.


Customer engagement does not often run how the marketer predicts it will. You must set out how to respond when dealing with enquiries, information, complaints, dissatisfaction and customer anger. Each style of inbound comment, should be assessed for tone and manner, responded to and considered. The customer engagement framework therefore must take these situations into account.

An example of an engagement framework is shown below:

online engagement Eileen Brown digital marketing amastra

It is important to recognise the differing amounts of effort needed to produce content on different channels. Whilst it is easy to take a picture and upload it on social sites, full production videos with voice overs take considerable effort and should be built into the plan.

Above all, your engagement strategy needs to be workable for your brand. Your primary goal is to encourage conversation.


It is also important to track the metrics that show that the campaign has been successful. Often marketers focus on easily accessible metrics, such as followers, likes and shares. These metrics, whilst useful are not actually as important as other quantitative and qualitative metrics.

Whether that metric is, make sure that each set metric matches the original defined objectives. If you want to understand what people think of your brand the stated objective is listening.

Monitoring success is easy – but getting the correct measurements that actually mean something – is much harder than you think. Creating your all-up marketing campaign will take significant time, and resources. Maintaining, monitoring and optimising the campaign will take even more time. Make sure you plan for it to be a success..


Kitchen Aid’s Crisis Management success

imageWhat happened to Kitchen Aid the other week could happen to any brand  During the presidential debate, one of the team that managed the Kitchen Aid’s official Twitter account made an error that blew up very quickly.

The official @kitchenaidUSA account tweeted:

"Obamas gma even knew it was going 2 b bad! ‘She died 3 days b4 he became president,"

Kitchen Aid deleted the Tweet, and issued an apology

Cynthia Soledad, head of Kitchen Aid went on the record to talk to Mashable and apologise for the Tweet. She immediately took responsibility, spoke freely to the media and quenched the social media fire that burned.

It seems to have worked. Mashable published this image from Simply Measures showing how quickly the mentions of the brand reduced as the apologies and media interviews were broadcast.

Crisis management depends on three things:

Swift ownership of the issue by senior leader

Immediate apology or retraction of the offensive statement

Availability for follow up information

In the background, at the brand other things are important to ensure that damage is limited:

Adequate training and awareness of crisis consequences

Defined lines of communication and crisis plan

Damage limitation and virtual messaging team (PR / spokespeople / exec team)

And most of all – a co-ordinated response across the relevant channel. If it happens on Twitter, rectify it on Twitter, if it happens on Facebook, rectify it on Facebook.  Then ensure that other channels point to the apology and damage limitation statement. It has got to be authentic, it has got to be open, it has got to be honest.

And it has got to be done quickly – before brand perception starts its downhill slide

Eileen is a social business strategist, ZDNet columnist and author of Working The Crowd: Social Media Marketing for Business. Contact her to find out how she can help your business extend its reach.

Image credit: smith_cl9 and Mashable

Crisis communication: Twitter and the Queensland floods

A year after the floods that devastated Queensland Australia, a report has been released by the ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries & Innovation (CCI).  The report discusses the impact that Twitter had in enabling efficient crisis communication during the floodins episode..

There are some interesting call outs about Twitter and the use of hashtags in the top line points from the report:

The hashtag, #qldfloods became the central coordinating mechanism for floods-related user activity on Twitter.

50-60% of #qldfloods messages were retweets

30-40% of messages contained links to further information

Twitter users amplified emergency information and thereby increased its reach.

Twitter became a source for mainstream media to report on the flooding.

Users uploaded and distributed flood photographs taken on their smartphones and digital cameras to sites such as Twitpic.

Retweeting of messages focussed especially on tweets with immediate relevance to the crisis at hand

Over 35,000 tweets containing the #qldfloods hashtag were sent during the period of 10-16 January

More than 15,500 Twitter users used the hashtag #qldfloods.


Source: CCI Australia flood report

The report also shows how much we share images – especially related to disasters, with those not in the immediate area of the flooding participating in sharing the images and broadcasting links which were picked up by media and shared on Facebook.

There are pointers for emergency services to consider coordinating a crisis response using social tools such as Twitter and Facebook:

An established presence on Twitter is important, and on-going monitoring of Twitter activities is valuable.

The community is willing to support and assist the work of emergency services

Emergency services should develop comprehensive, flexible strategies for using social media in times of Crisis

Emergency services staff should be trained

Emergency organisations should engage with and respond to messages received from the general public.

If Emergency services and official organisations use social media effectively, then it is easy to get the right information spreading rapidly. False information is quickly suppressed as the report shows,whilst information about help is propagated to rebuild communities after disaster strikes.

Used correctly, Twitter and other forms of social media have valuable parts to play in crisis situations.

Unfortunately, there are still many organisations that don’t yet have the correct procedures in place.  But with the actions of people in the community, help and information gets to those who need it most.

Eileen is a social business strategist, ZDNet columnist and author of Working The Crowd: Social Media Marketing for Business. Contact her to find out how she can help your business extend its reach.


SAAB files for bankruptcy: Fans rage at GM

SAAB have petitioned the Swedish government for bankruptcy, which signals the demise of the car brand.  SAAB is now owned by General Motors who are being blamed for the downturn by fans of SAAB.

Fans have flooded GM’s page with angry rants about SAAB as these comments on GM’s Facebook page show:


GM has wisely not decided to respond to the tirade on its Facebook page, but more importantly it is not deleting any of the negative posts.  It also appears to have a co-ordinated approach to its marketing communications and has had no flippant marketing campaigns or posts on their wall from other divisions of GM.

In times of crisis, when a brand has experienced the ‘occupation’ of  its brand page by disgruntled fans it’s important that a brand has a co-ordinated approach to marketing communications.  Unfortunately Qantas did not, offering prizes of luxury pyjamas in the midst of a union dispute.

When Nestle’s Facebook page was brandjacked over its policy of using palm oil in chocolate production the brand hit back:

“So, let’s see, we have to be well-mannered all the time but it’s perfectly acceptable to refer to us as everything from idiots right the way down to sons of satan with a few obscenities and strange sexual practices thrown in?”

It’s better to remain silent during the outburst of initial anger and go back with a considered measured response.

An ill timed, snappy retort might fan the flames of fury further and damage the brand reputation and image.  GM is doing the right thing by keeping quiet.  It will be able to craft a much better considered response if it waits for a while.

It remains to be seen however whether a considered response will pacify lovers of this iconic car, or serve to cause a second wave of anger over a cost based business decision, devoid of emotion.

Only time will tell…

Eileen is a social business strategist, ZDNet columnist and author of Working The Crowd: Social Media Marketing for Business. Contact her to find out how she can help your business extend its reach.

Twitter: Not the place for a vitriolic argument

Dear me..

Sometimes Twitter is used as though its a personal channel of communication between 2 people and not the rest of the connected world. Personal insults get traded without any awareness that the rest of us can see what’s happening.  So people lash out and they don’t realise the consequences.

Last week, Otarian, the vegan restaurant announced that it wasn’t going to open a restaurant in London.  The food blogger Chris Pople commented on the fact that the restaurant in London’s Covent Garden was closed.  Unfortunately, Otarian took exception to this and responded bitterly.  Magnus has a selection of Tweets  on his storify where he talk about the story of a hashtag gone sourGrub Street picked up on the fact that the Twitter feed had gone haywire


Link to original tweet

This diatribe between Otarian and anyone that comments on Twitter  to them – or uses the hashtag otarianwatch is interesting to see.  It’s either a very clever bit of PR or utter foolishness on the part of Otarian.  Looking at the vitriol  on the stream from 5th – 7th August – I’m not so sure.  There’s anger certainly and a lot of bitterness, resentment and nasty comments.  All recorded forever on Twitter via links and screen clippings and blogs. 

As Judith says in her Tweet…  


A great example in how not to win friends and influence people  Social media specialists and Twitter trainers –  you can see that there’s still a heck of a lot of work still to be done…  Smile

Eileen Brown is a social media consultant and author of Working The Crowd: Social Media Marketing for Business.

Contact her to find out how she can help your business extend its reach.

Even Fox News needs a crisis management plan

These Tweets rushed around the world last week.  News that Obama had been assassinated appeared on Fox News politics Twitter news feed…  Fox News apologised for the misinformation and any distress that might have been caused.


Hat tip to David Meerman for capturing the screenshots of the relevant Tweets before they were removed…

There’s a problem here that goes far beyond the normal Twitter hacking issue – which is bad enough.

We live in a 24 x 7 world of communications.  Fox News is a 24 x 7 news channel.  Why isn’t their social media monitoring 24 x 7 too?

Why didn’t Fox News have a very strong password to try to guard against hacking attempts?

Why didn’t someone alert Fox News politics that there was an issue?  Where were their alternate communications channels in case of a crisis?

Where were the remainder of the Fox News Politics team of Tweeters?  Was anyone authorised to respond across the business?

Why didn’t Fox News respond on Fox News politics behalf?

Crisis management plans are important.  See my article on social media crisis management and things that you need to consider, crisis wise – and create your own framework as soon as you can.  And make sure you are empowered to implement it – as soon as a crisis hits…

Eileen Brown is a social media consultant and author of Working The Crowd: Social Media Marketing for Business.

Contact her to find out how she can help your business extend its reach.

Versace gives–and takes away

Versace got their social media activities wrong the other day which resulted in an interesting uprising on Facebook.  They removed the ability for Fans to post to their Facebook Wall after allowing them free access to post.

Fans had been complaining about sandblasting jeans which can result in the worker inhaling silica dust.  Several deaths have been reported as a result of this activity according to Mashable.

Fans  can still add comments to posts by the brand, but can no longer create their own posts and post them.  There has been an outcry at the removal of permissions and deletion of posts.  Remember the outcry over Nestle last year? Greenpeace bombarded the Facebook page with posts complaining about the company’s use of Palm oil.  The issue wasn’t that people were being prevented from posting – rather that posts were being deleted.  Privileges were taken away that used to exist for Facebook fans


It’s really simple to set appropriate permissions right at the start on your Facebook Page.  Its as simple as setting the appropriate check box.

But brands, desperate for engagement with their customers, often don’t think of the backlash that can occur if previously allowed actions are taken away.

This would have been so simple to avoid, had Versace thought through the impact of allowing something – then taking it away.

Getting your plans, strategy and settings right first time can go a long way to avoiding issues like these.

And brands like Versace, with a little more planning could have avoided this crisis completely.